Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern discusses his recent article on the probable Israeli/U.S. attack on Iran, Israel’s need for new war in Iran to keep the U.S. military in the Mideast due to the failure in Iraq, the outspokenness of the military brass against an attack on Iran, AIPAC’s drafting of the new Iran war resolutions, Bush and Cheney’s loyalty to Israel, the never-ending conflicts created by the Israel occupation of Palestine, the need for the American people and Congress to understand the catastrophe that would ensue from attacking Iran and the urgency of impeachment.

Ray McGovern was a CIA analyst for 27 years – from the John F. Kennedy administration to that of George H. W. Bush and is a co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.

Today’s guest editorial on developments in Lebanon from regular Fanonite contributor Alberto Cruz of Centro de Estudios Políticos para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Desarollo (CEPRID).

The taking of Beirut by Hizbollah militants and their allies from May 7th to May 11th foiled a political military operation supported by the US and Saudi Arabia against Lebanese patriotic nationalist forces meant to weaken and defeat Hizbollah decisively .

Since Hizbollah defeated Israel in the war of the summer of 2006, both the US administration and the Saudi monarchy have promoted a dual strategy against that organization : on the one hand to reduce its prestige among significant parts of Arab people’s opinion from Morocco to Iraq, regardless of religious affiliation and on the other to disarm its military structure.

The campaign to undermine Hizbollah began from the very moment the war ended and spread further when that organization and the patriotic nationalist forces supporting it (Maronite Christians, and leftist secular groups) began a campaign of civil disobedience against the Siniora government in November 2006.

Read the rest of this entry »

Latuff superman Iraq imperialism

Slave Revolt…of Sorts

April 28, 2008

End of the empire is nigh. Prior to the invasion of Iraq, US planners were hoping to find an Iraqi Karzai. Things have turned out so poorly, that even the prototype is hinting defection. ‘Afghan Leader Criticizes U.S. on Conduct of War‘, Carlotta Gall of the New York Times reports. (thanks Jairo)

KABUL, Afghanistan — President Hamid Karzai strongly criticized the British and American conduct of the war here on Friday, insisting in an interview that his government be given the lead in policy decisions.

Mr. Karzai said that he wanted American forces to stop arresting suspected Taliban and their sympathizers, and that the continued threat of arrest and past mistreatment were discouraging Taliban from coming forward to lay down their arms.

He criticized the American-led coalition as prosecuting the war on terrorism in Afghan villages, saying the real terrorist threat lay in sanctuaries of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Pakistan.

Read the rest of this entry »

Truth to Power

April 27, 2008

Bill Moyers interviews the Reverend Jeremiah Wright in his first broadcast interview with a journalist since he became embroiled in a controversy for his remarks and his relationship with Barack Obama. Wright, who retired in early 2008 as pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, where Senator Obama is a member, has been at the center of controversy for comments he made during sermons, which surfaced in the press in March. More here. (via Juan Cole)

Also check out ‘Amen, Rev. Wright!‘ by Laurie King-Irani.

As I type this, I am watching the Rev. Jeremiah Wright on Bill Moyers’ Journal on PBS here in the United States. It’s quite a revelation.

He is wonderful, wise, and brave. He’s speaking some harsh but necessary truths. The segments of his sermons knit together by the Clinton campaign and the likes of Fox News are a cynical attempt so sow hatred and discord, to win a political campaign by and through fear. If you have not seen this interview, you owe it to yourself and your country, if you are at all interested in justice, honesty, healing, and truth, to watch it all the way through.

He’s absolutely right about the fact that the United States of America was founded through injustice and ugly acts against Native Americans and African slaves. Why is this so hard to absorb? If a nation cannot face the truth about the past, it’s not likely to survive the challenges of the future.

In the last few years, it has pained me a lot to see friends and family rejoicing at the bombing of Iraq, at the killing of Palestinians, and the criminal torture of people at Guantanamo and in other legal black holes constructed and maintained by the US government across the globe. We don’t even know the full dimensions of this yet.

I’m horrified that family members and friends love the program “24″ and celebrate its hero, the fictional character of Jack Bauer. I’ve probably forgotten more about the history of US foreign policy and the extent and severity of violations of international humanitarian law in the Middle East than most of my family and friends will ever know. Yet my views are considered whacky. The delusions that sustain our body politic, the myths that we cling to in the face of reality about our history and our current world role, and the dangers that lie therein, never cease to stun me. We have to push beyond the imposed boundaries of “thinkable thought.” For years, I’ve experienced at a visceral and daily level how important this is with respect to US involvement in the madness, injustice, and suffering in the Middle East. Speak about this too much publicly in the US and you’ll hear from colleagues that it’s not good for one’s career to voice these perspectives.

Self-censorship is the by-word of academe and journalism where the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is concerned. I refuse to shut up. There are so many parallels with the injustices against Native Americans and African Americans in the Middle East today. Rational, open-minded, and intelligent discussion of perspectives other than those we are permitted to think, see and say in these United States might help us get past a lot of harm and hell. But then, it took about a century for people to realize that African Americans had been treated worse than animals here in the US. Hatred, racism, and violence of all kinds are enabled by implicit assumptions that we ignore at our peril, whether we are taking on domestic or foreign policy challenges.

I am very grateful that Bill Moyers, who represents the very best of American journalism, had the guts, gumption, and sense of responsibility to interview Rev. Wright and look at the story behind the story, to ask questions and examine contexts. That’s what sane, responsible, intelligent CITIZENS of a democracy are supposed to do: assume nothing; question authority; look beyond the spin and B.S. and ask “whose interests are being served by presenting history in a particular way?”

I agree with Barack Obama that the United States is at a very dangerous intersection. We have to look in all directions if we want to take the route that will lead us out of the darkness we’ve wandered into. That means looking in places and in directions we are usually happy to ignore and dismiss, and seeing what is there, not just choosing a narrow field of vision and insisting to ourselves and others that this is the only view, the only perspective, that one can possibly have or take.

And after watching this program tonight, I am more certain than ever that the Clinton campaign has sullied itself with the worst aspects of American history and politics. If they win, it will not be simply a loss for Barack Obama, but a loss of our better angels and the loss of a chance to take the right turn at a dangerous fork in the road, after taking (or being taken along) some very wrong turns over the last eight years.

Laurie King-Irani is the North American Coordinator of the International Campaign for Justice for the Victims of Sabra and Shatila ( ICJVSS)

‘Behind Sadr’s warning to the US lies an unavoidable fact: He holds critical cards in Iraq’, the Real News reports. The coverage also includes Pepe Escobar’s excellent interview with Patrick Cockburn.

Part 2 of the Interview.

Also check out:

In Sadr City’s new wall, shadows of Gaza, Vietnam

Aijaz Ahmad: Wall meant to partition Sadr City’s residents is population control ahead of elections

Todays guest editorial from Alberto Cruz of Centro de Estudios Políticos para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Desarollo (CEPRID) on Nepal’s transition away from monarchy. (Also check Democracy Now’s coverage of the issue)

Nepal has entered the year 2065 of its calendar and (after two postponements) has now held elections for the Constituent Assembly that may end the monarchy and open the way to the proclamation of a republic. This is an aspiration of a majority of the Nepali people and has been symbolized by the political and military struggle of the Maoist Communist Party of Nepal (CPN-M) since 1996.

Nepal thus enters a new era following the popular rebellion that defeated the coup d’etat of the feudal monarchy and forced King Gyanendra to leave public life while maintaining the institution of the monarchy. Now, the principal task of the Constituent Assembly is to proclaim a Republic, assuming that the 23 point Agreement between the Seven Party Alliance and the Maoists is honoured. That agreement followed the Maoists’ abandonment of the interim government when previous agreements were not kept.

Read the rest of this entry »

Zapatista

April 20, 2008

Another documentary by Big Noise Films this time on the Zapatistas of Chiapas Mexico. The Zapatistas (EZLN) are an armed revolutionary group that rose up on New Years day 1994 in opposition to NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement). They are ideologically opposed to corporate globalisation and neoliberalism – which they see as exploitative and destructive to their indigenous culture.

They’re also quite famous as the first resistance movement to garner popular global support through innovitive use of the internet. Their charismatic – and media savvy – spokesperson Marcos with his poetic philosophy and stylish image, I believe, played a large role in their success in this area.

Can I speak? Can I speak about our dead at this celebration? After all, they are the ones who made it possible. Can someone say that we are here because they are not? Is that permitted?

I have a dead brother. Is there someone here who doesn’t have a dead brother? I have a dead brother. He was killed by a bullet to his head. It was the before dawn on the 1st of January, 1994. Way before dawn the bullet that was shot. Way before dawn the death that kissed the forehead of my brother. My brother used to laugh a lot but now he doesn’t laugh any more. I couldn’t keep my brother in my pocket, but I kept the bullet that killed him. On another day before dawn I asked the bullet where it came from. It said: “From the rifle of a soldier of the government of a powerful person who serves another powerful person who serves another powerful person who serves another in the whole world. The bullet that killed my brother has no nationality.

The fight that must be fought to keep our brothers with us, rather than the bullets that have killed them, has no nationality either. For this purpose we zapatistas have many big pockets in our uniforms. Not for keeping bullets. For keeping brothers.

Jean-Paul Sartre: Human All Too Human.

What I find ironic is that BBC couldn’t find anyone better than the clown Bernard-Henry Levy, a man who is perhaps the antithesis of everything Sartre stood for.

Hizbullah Regroups

April 16, 2008

In July 2006 Hezbollah fought and won a defensive war against Israeli aggression. Now they prepare for the offensive – when Israel next attacks they plan to fight much of the war in its Northern territories. Begging the question: does Israel really know what its up against? The following by Nicholas Blanford (the podcast on this page is also worth listening to, thanks Ann).

In south Lebanon, where the 2006 summertime war between Israel and militant Shiite Hizbullah was played out, villages are abuzz with talk of another devastating conflict between the two archfoes.Over the past few weeks, military activity on both sides of the border has contributed to war jitters as both Israel and Hizbullah are seemingly poised to strike.

The Israeli military just wrapped up a nationwide war drill it dubbed “Turning Point 2,” and Hizbullah appears to have devised new battle plans that include cross-border raids into Israel and has mounted a sweeping recruitment and training drive, even marshaling non-Shiites and former Israeli-allied militiamen into new reservist units.

“The holy fighters are completely focused on the next war, even ignoring families and friends. They are just waiting for the next war,” says Jawad, a Hizbullah fighter.

Still, many diplomats and analysts in Beirut say that neither side has an interest in coming to blows again, despite the buildup.

“The elements of conflict are still there, and it is possible that something small can get out of hand with neither side wanting it,” says Timur Goksel, a university lecturer in Beirut and veteran observer of the Hizbullah-Israeli conflict. But, he adds, the heightened activity is “mainly posturing.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.