<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Georgia War a Neocon Election Ploy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fanonite.org/2008/08/13/georgia-war-a-neocon-election-ploy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fanonite.org/2008/08/13/georgia-war-a-neocon-election-ploy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladymae</title>
		<link>http://fanonite.org/2008/08/13/georgia-war-a-neocon-election-ploy/#comment-12658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ladymae]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanonite.wordpress.com/?p=2434#comment-12658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason I found this article was in researching a link between Obama, malloch-brown and soros. Even more interesting is the CHANGE used in campaigns for Soros buddies when they have no intentions of any change other for themselves of more power and money. See piece from the article below. Mark Malloch Brown is a friend of Georgia&#039;s President Mikheil Saakashvili and Obama frequently calls upon malloch brown and considers him a friend and George Soros creates McCain had something to do with this? How far will the left go to destroy the world and the people in it for greed? I haven&#039;t quite figured out all the sources and reasons why this may have been done during election time to help Obama but I will. Maybe because Obama felt if he told them to play nice and make up they would and Obama would be the great unifier? It didn&#039;t work did it? 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/562

In February 2006 Mark Malloch Brown, then the UN Secretary General’s chief of staff, was interviewed by Claudia Rosett at the UN, and found himself increasingly furious at the line of questioning about his housing arrangements in New York. Malloch Brown had caused controversy with his decision to live on the smart country estate of George Soros, the financier who forced Britain out of the ERM in 1992, and a major donor to left-wing causes.
One of the Brown government’s key selling points--part of its ‘change’ message--]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I found this article was in researching a link between Obama, malloch-brown and soros. Even more interesting is the CHANGE used in campaigns for Soros buddies when they have no intentions of any change other for themselves of more power and money. See piece from the article below. Mark Malloch Brown is a friend of Georgia&#8217;s President Mikheil Saakashvili and Obama frequently calls upon malloch brown and considers him a friend and George Soros creates McCain had something to do with this? How far will the left go to destroy the world and the people in it for greed? I haven&#8217;t quite figured out all the sources and reasons why this may have been done during election time to help Obama but I will. Maybe because Obama felt if he told them to play nice and make up they would and Obama would be the great unifier? It didn&#8217;t work did it? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/562" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/562</a></p>
<p>In February 2006 Mark Malloch Brown, then the UN Secretary General’s chief of staff, was interviewed by Claudia Rosett at the UN, and found himself increasingly furious at the line of questioning about his housing arrangements in New York. Malloch Brown had caused controversy with his decision to live on the smart country estate of George Soros, the financier who forced Britain out of the ERM in 1992, and a major donor to left-wing causes.<br />
One of the Brown government’s key selling points&#8211;part of its ‘change’ message&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morris108</title>
		<link>http://fanonite.org/2008/08/13/georgia-war-a-neocon-election-ploy/#comment-12642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[morris108]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanonite.wordpress.com/?p=2434#comment-12642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Real reason for the Georgia war:
http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/immediately-after-us-losing-control-of-central-asian-gas-and-oil-bp-run-btc-pipeline-is-blown-up-war-provoked-in-georgia/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Real reason for the Georgia war:<br />
<a href="http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/immediately-after-us-losing-control-of-central-asian-gas-and-oil-bp-run-btc-pipeline-is-blown-up-war-provoked-in-georgia/" rel="nofollow">http://morris108.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/immediately-after-us-losing-control-of-central-asian-gas-and-oil-bp-run-btc-pipeline-is-blown-up-war-provoked-in-georgia/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeborn</title>
		<link>http://fanonite.org/2008/08/13/georgia-war-a-neocon-election-ploy/#comment-12624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freeborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanonite.wordpress.com/?p=2434#comment-12624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of the soft left commentary on the recent conflict in Georgia has focussed on the US foreign policy angle.Coming to the fairly obvious conclusions that:
(a)Russia was unduly provoked by a US-backed regime into its aggressive counter-attack
(b)The US overplayed its hand and needs to go back to the drawing board because it has just lost a major round  in the fight against its imperial competitor(Russia to wit)over who controls energy security

However one can&#039;t wondering what happened to the British in all this?

The image of the passive poodle meekly following the 
US that was cultivated by left commentary during the Blair years obscured the far more aggressive impulse that has always characterised British defence and foreign policy elites.

Few commentators noticed the way the British led the US in its drive to inflict a major Vietnam-like reverse against the Soviets in Afghanistan.Indeed few acknowledged that the whole idea of a US Arc of Crisis strategy across Eurasia as a whole came from British foreign policy elites before it was embraced by Albright and Brzezinski as key to their Grand Chessboard strategy.

The Arc strategy evolved into the Zbig&#039;s Rimlands strategy to penetrate and dominate Central Asia by a policy of fomenting tension in the Caucasus,and to manipulate the political evolution of such post-Soviet states as Ukraine,Belarus,Moldova and Georgia.

The war in Georgia has its roots in the deadly Great Game of pipeline politics involving Central Asia,the Caspian,Afghanistan and the Balkans initiated by Albright and Zbig during the Clinton years.

The Bush core foreign policy team and Cheney-protected neo-con network like Zbig before them is connected with its long-standing ties to Big Oil(esp.BP,Chevron) has taken up the reins of the same Anglo/Zbig global strategy.

Yet,ingeniously the British hand in what has recently transpired in the Caucasus and brought us, according to some commentators,to the brink of WW3 remains nigh invisible.

Thus it seems taboo to mention in polite circles that Gordon Brown&#039;s current Sec.Gen.of the FCO Lord Malloch-Brown is a fairly conspicuous ally of the Soros OSI network that not only installed Saakashvili in the first place,but pretty much controls Democratic Party finance in the US as well.

The British role in destabilising the Caucasus and promoting a US/Russia stand-off is mirrored further east in the role played by British intelligence and security elites in supporting the Xinjiang separatist groups in order to weaken China.

The Islamist ETIM separatists are regarded by China as particularly threatening during the current Beijing Olympics.The group like many other Islamist groups has close links to British intelligence circles.

Clearly the aggressive role that British foreign policy and financial elites have taken with regard to Russia and China might be a more fruitful field for analysts to mine than has hitherto been the case.Such elites have often led US administrations in foreign policy directions they have might have avoided as not being in America&#039;s best interests had they given them more careful consideration.

The current failed nuclear bluff against Putin in Georgia seems to have left Bush with egg on his face while the role played by Brown,Malloch-Brown and Soros in its instigation seems to have escaped any real analytical attention whatever.
 

The focus on]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of the soft left commentary on the recent conflict in Georgia has focussed on the US foreign policy angle.Coming to the fairly obvious conclusions that:<br />
(a)Russia was unduly provoked by a US-backed regime into its aggressive counter-attack<br />
(b)The US overplayed its hand and needs to go back to the drawing board because it has just lost a major round  in the fight against its imperial competitor(Russia to wit)over who controls energy security</p>
<p>However one can&#8217;t wondering what happened to the British in all this?</p>
<p>The image of the passive poodle meekly following the<br />
US that was cultivated by left commentary during the Blair years obscured the far more aggressive impulse that has always characterised British defence and foreign policy elites.</p>
<p>Few commentators noticed the way the British led the US in its drive to inflict a major Vietnam-like reverse against the Soviets in Afghanistan.Indeed few acknowledged that the whole idea of a US Arc of Crisis strategy across Eurasia as a whole came from British foreign policy elites before it was embraced by Albright and Brzezinski as key to their Grand Chessboard strategy.</p>
<p>The Arc strategy evolved into the Zbig&#8217;s Rimlands strategy to penetrate and dominate Central Asia by a policy of fomenting tension in the Caucasus,and to manipulate the political evolution of such post-Soviet states as Ukraine,Belarus,Moldova and Georgia.</p>
<p>The war in Georgia has its roots in the deadly Great Game of pipeline politics involving Central Asia,the Caspian,Afghanistan and the Balkans initiated by Albright and Zbig during the Clinton years.</p>
<p>The Bush core foreign policy team and Cheney-protected neo-con network like Zbig before them is connected with its long-standing ties to Big Oil(esp.BP,Chevron) has taken up the reins of the same Anglo/Zbig global strategy.</p>
<p>Yet,ingeniously the British hand in what has recently transpired in the Caucasus and brought us, according to some commentators,to the brink of WW3 remains nigh invisible.</p>
<p>Thus it seems taboo to mention in polite circles that Gordon Brown&#8217;s current Sec.Gen.of the FCO Lord Malloch-Brown is a fairly conspicuous ally of the Soros OSI network that not only installed Saakashvili in the first place,but pretty much controls Democratic Party finance in the US as well.</p>
<p>The British role in destabilising the Caucasus and promoting a US/Russia stand-off is mirrored further east in the role played by British intelligence and security elites in supporting the Xinjiang separatist groups in order to weaken China.</p>
<p>The Islamist ETIM separatists are regarded by China as particularly threatening during the current Beijing Olympics.The group like many other Islamist groups has close links to British intelligence circles.</p>
<p>Clearly the aggressive role that British foreign policy and financial elites have taken with regard to Russia and China might be a more fruitful field for analysts to mine than has hitherto been the case.Such elites have often led US administrations in foreign policy directions they have might have avoided as not being in America&#8217;s best interests had they given them more careful consideration.</p>
<p>The current failed nuclear bluff against Putin in Georgia seems to have left Bush with egg on his face while the role played by Brown,Malloch-Brown and Soros in its instigation seems to have escaped any real analytical attention whatever.</p>
<p>The focus on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

