Israeli Terror in Gaza

April 28, 2008

Four siblings and their mother have been killed in an Israeli raid in Beit Hanoun, northern Gaza.

Pepe Escobar: Real story behind September air strike has never been investigated

This is what happens when an Arab regime is so afraid of its own people that it covers up the crimes others commit against it lest it expose its weakness. But the story behind the story should be of higher relevance. With the rise in belligerent rhetoric in recent days, Jim Lobe — one of the world’s finest investigative journalists — raises the pertinent question: ‘Hawks Resurgent?’

Are the latest accusations and tough language leveled against Iran, Syria, and North Korea evidence of a resurgence by the remaining hawks in the administration of President George W. Bush hoping for a final confrontation against one or more members of the revised “axis of evil” before his term next January?

That’s the big question here this week, particularly following Thursday’s long-awaited intelligence briefings to Congress about alleged North Korean involvement in the construction of a “covert nuclear reactor” in Syria that was destroyed in a raid by Israeli warplanes in September last year.

Read the rest of this entry »

Today’s guest editorial is another installment in my friend toni solo’s Globalization and terror series.

Corporate globalization and its equally misshapen twin, the fake “war on terror”, look like the Western Bloc’s last crooked chance to sustain a few decades longer its member countries’ habitual global power and privilege. John Pilger has noted that seven months after the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York, Condoleezza Rice spoke of the “opportunity” that outrage presented. She and her Bush regime cronies subsequently imposed their imperialist agenda abroad and their fascist agenda at home.

Globally, corporate consumer capitalism now cannot even deliver minimal subsistence food security, let alone broader economic stability. The global crisis presents another opportunity for suave barbarian advocates of mass murder like Rice and similar-minded me-too’s like Hilary Clinton to help provoke and exploit conflict around the world in the service of their corporate plutocracy’s narcissistic greed. Accordingly, G7 leaders have recently gamed a streamlined variant of their endless hypocritical sadistic war on the world’s impoverished majority.

Read the rest of this entry »

Patrick Cockburn on Iraq

April 28, 2008

Media Matters with Bob McChesney has been an important source of my political education. Back when I was living in Dubai, I would escape the intellectual aridity of the place by downloading an episode to my mp3 player and going for a walks or a drive. I would highly recommend going through the archive and listening to interviews past and present. McChesney is the world’s leading media scholar, and his interviewees are all the top names in their respective fields.

Cockburn’s reply to one of the questions about sanctions is a bit convoluted so let me address it here. First of all, the Kurdish region fared better under the sanctions because it was receiving a far higher proportion of the Oil-for-Food money than South Central Iraq. Secondly, unlike south central, the Kurdish region did not face the kind of crippling embargo that devastated Iraqi society. Thirdly, Kurds were trading with Iran, Turkey and Syria throughout the period of the sanctions. But lastly — and most importantly — the money was not handled by Saddam; it was deposited in a UN escrow account and much of it was going to service the reparation claims not just from Kuwait, but even entities such as British Bird-watchers Society, KFC, etc. Here I would highly recommend Hans Von Sponeck’s A Different Kind of War: The UN Sanctions Regime in Iraq.

And here Pepe Escobar of the excellent Real News continues his discussion with Patrick Cockburn on Muqtada al-Sadr.

Meeting Resistance

April 28, 2008

Meeting Resistance is now available on DVD. This is not a big commercial release. Please honour the rare courage of these journalists and assist their work by purchasing it here.

The Race Card

April 28, 2008

‘Hillary has cynically turned to the one argument she has left: race’, writes Gary Younge, my favorite sage. ‘She failed to convince the electorate of her own viability. Now her team claims that voters won’t back a black candidate’.

It is one of the enduring paradoxes of American racism that those black Americans most likely to exercise their full rights as citizens — to vote, to stand, to speak out — are the most likely to be branded as unpatriotic.

“Of course the fact that a person believes in racial equality doesn’t prove that he’s a communist,” said the chairman of a loyalty review board, one of the McCarthyite kangaroo courts that sat in judgment of possible communists, in the 50s. “But it certainly makes you look twice, doesn’t it? You can’t get away from the fact that racial equality is part of the communist line.”

Assuming that African-Americans could not possibly work out that white supremacy was not in their interests by themselves, their detractors routinely accused them of acting under influences both foreign and malign. The FBI wasted millions of dollars and hours trying in vain to prove that Martin Luther King was a communist. For those who would not know their place and were not assassinated, the punishment was often the revocation of whatever rights of citizenship they had. Already denied the vote, freedom of movement and association, Paul Robeson was refused a passport in 1950 and confined to the US. When his lawyers asked why, they were told that “his frequent criticism of the treatment of blacks in the United States should not be aired in foreign countries”. In 1963 the intellectual and activist WEB Dubois was similarly grounded without passport privileges and so moved to the recently liberated Ghana.

Read the rest of this entry »

‘Is Obama elitist? Is his poor bowling a turn-off? This is the nit-picking idiocy of 24-hour news TV’ writes Charlie Brooker.

Is Barack Obama elitist? Will his middle name harm his campaign? Are voters turned off by his lack of bowling prowess? Did he give Hillary the finger during a speech in Raleigh, North Carolina? When he picks his nose, which digit does he use? And what does that say about him?

The first four questions were genuinely posed by US TV news over the past few weeks. The nose-picking question wasn’t. But it’s no more puerile and pointless than the ones that were. The answers to the real questions, incidentally, run roughly as follows:

Read the rest of this entry »

‘Vice-President, shilling troupe of retired generals, deliver fantastic tales for their cause’ writes Eric Margolis.

U.S. intelligence released a dramatic video last Thursday, supposedly taken by an Israeli spy, that purportedly showed North Korean technicians helping build a nuclear reactor in Syria.

The reactor was destroyed seven months ago by Israeli warplanes.

Until now Israel and the U.S. have remained silent about the attack. Syria claimed a warehouse was hit, but curiously said nothing more about what was an act of war. Washington offered no proof the reactor, if it was one, would have produced weapons rather than electric power. U.S. and Israeli intelligence have long stated Syria had no nuclear weapons capabilities.

Vice-President Dick Cheney and fellow neocons forced the CIA to release the James Bondish video in an effort to sabotage an impending six-nation agreement to end North Korea’s nuclear program. They bitterly oppose the deal for being too soft on Pyongyang. Neocons long have worried the possibility of North Korea selling nuclear technology to Arab states posed a potential threat to Israel.

Read the rest of this entry »

Media Control

April 27, 2008

In the following lecture Media Control Chomsky examines the history and nature of PR. Tracing its roots back to a British propaganda campaign to bring the United States into the First World War; he then explains how the ripple effect of their success led to not only the Nazi propaganda machine but also the modern day PR industry. He argues that this industry and its new theories of “engineering consent” rest on a philosophy that is profoundly anti-democratic famously saying ‘propaganda is to democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.’

Read Noam Chomsky Media Control (pdf)


Truth to Power

April 27, 2008

Bill Moyers interviews the Reverend Jeremiah Wright in his first broadcast interview with a journalist since he became embroiled in a controversy for his remarks and his relationship with Barack Obama. Wright, who retired in early 2008 as pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, where Senator Obama is a member, has been at the center of controversy for comments he made during sermons, which surfaced in the press in March. More here. (via Juan Cole)

Also check out ‘Amen, Rev. Wright!‘ by Laurie King-Irani.

As I type this, I am watching the Rev. Jeremiah Wright on Bill Moyers’ Journal on PBS here in the United States. It’s quite a revelation.

He is wonderful, wise, and brave. He’s speaking some harsh but necessary truths. The segments of his sermons knit together by the Clinton campaign and the likes of Fox News are a cynical attempt so sow hatred and discord, to win a political campaign by and through fear. If you have not seen this interview, you owe it to yourself and your country, if you are at all interested in justice, honesty, healing, and truth, to watch it all the way through.

He’s absolutely right about the fact that the United States of America was founded through injustice and ugly acts against Native Americans and African slaves. Why is this so hard to absorb? If a nation cannot face the truth about the past, it’s not likely to survive the challenges of the future.

In the last few years, it has pained me a lot to see friends and family rejoicing at the bombing of Iraq, at the killing of Palestinians, and the criminal torture of people at Guantanamo and in other legal black holes constructed and maintained by the US government across the globe. We don’t even know the full dimensions of this yet.

I’m horrified that family members and friends love the program “24″ and celebrate its hero, the fictional character of Jack Bauer. I’ve probably forgotten more about the history of US foreign policy and the extent and severity of violations of international humanitarian law in the Middle East than most of my family and friends will ever know. Yet my views are considered whacky. The delusions that sustain our body politic, the myths that we cling to in the face of reality about our history and our current world role, and the dangers that lie therein, never cease to stun me. We have to push beyond the imposed boundaries of “thinkable thought.” For years, I’ve experienced at a visceral and daily level how important this is with respect to US involvement in the madness, injustice, and suffering in the Middle East. Speak about this too much publicly in the US and you’ll hear from colleagues that it’s not good for one’s career to voice these perspectives.

Self-censorship is the by-word of academe and journalism where the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is concerned. I refuse to shut up. There are so many parallels with the injustices against Native Americans and African Americans in the Middle East today. Rational, open-minded, and intelligent discussion of perspectives other than those we are permitted to think, see and say in these United States might help us get past a lot of harm and hell. But then, it took about a century for people to realize that African Americans had been treated worse than animals here in the US. Hatred, racism, and violence of all kinds are enabled by implicit assumptions that we ignore at our peril, whether we are taking on domestic or foreign policy challenges.

I am very grateful that Bill Moyers, who represents the very best of American journalism, had the guts, gumption, and sense of responsibility to interview Rev. Wright and look at the story behind the story, to ask questions and examine contexts. That’s what sane, responsible, intelligent CITIZENS of a democracy are supposed to do: assume nothing; question authority; look beyond the spin and B.S. and ask “whose interests are being served by presenting history in a particular way?”

I agree with Barack Obama that the United States is at a very dangerous intersection. We have to look in all directions if we want to take the route that will lead us out of the darkness we’ve wandered into. That means looking in places and in directions we are usually happy to ignore and dismiss, and seeing what is there, not just choosing a narrow field of vision and insisting to ourselves and others that this is the only view, the only perspective, that one can possibly have or take.

And after watching this program tonight, I am more certain than ever that the Clinton campaign has sullied itself with the worst aspects of American history and politics. If they win, it will not be simply a loss for Barack Obama, but a loss of our better angels and the loss of a chance to take the right turn at a dangerous fork in the road, after taking (or being taken along) some very wrong turns over the last eight years.

Laurie King-Irani is the North American Coordinator of the International Campaign for Justice for the Victims of Sabra and Shatila ( ICJVSS)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.