The Fanonite

First of all, BBC’s Newnight team deserves kudos for an excellent piece of investigative work by Richard Watson and Jeremy Paxman’s combative interview last night.

More than a year back I wrote on the origins of the Danish cartoons controversy, the source of which, unsurprisingly, turned out to be a neocon associate of Daniel Pipes. In a rare excellent piece of investigative reporting, BBC’s Newsnight has revealed that the evidence for a damning recent report published — and much publicized — by the neoconservative think-tank Policy Exchange was in fact fabricated. BBCs investigations, and a forensics expert revealed that the report alleging a rise of Muslim extremism actually fabricated receipts, and falsified documents to bolster its conclusions. (For a complete catalogue of the fabrications, check out Osama Saeed’s excellent post on the subject). But far from being discouraged by this most embarrassing expose, the ‘research’ director of Policy Exchange Dean Godson put on the most surreal Ostrich act seen on TV. Jeremy Paxman was in fine form for once, and did not leave the maggot off the hook.

Now Policy Exchange has a history of animosity towards British Muslims. It is not just notable Likudniks such as the lisping Godson, or Times‘ in-house turd-blossom Michael Gove who are associated with this outfit; it also benefits from the pro-bono services of New Statesman’s own Islamophobic fabricator, Martin Bright, who gave Gove a starring role in his own Channel 4 attack on UK Muslims. As a quid pro quo perhaps, Bright’s silly anti-Muslim pamphlets were published by Policy Exchange. Guardian’s once excellent Brian Whitaker also hit the pits earlier by publicizing the discredited PE report, so today, a shame-faced Whitaker reports on Newsnight’s expose only to try to downplay its significance, in order, perhaps, to cover his own role as a willing tool for the neocons.

So how extreme are these people? So much so, that even the Right-wing Daily Telegraph found Godson’s views too fanatical for its pages. In Daniel Pipe’s ultra-right Middle East Quarterly, Emanuele Ottolenghi of Labour Friends of Israel ruefully writes,

“In an interview with the British left-of-center Guardian daily, Martin Newland, editor of the conservative The Daily Telegraph, revealed that he fired editorialists Dean Godson and Barbara Amiel for being too pro-Israel. “It’s OK to be pro-Israel but not unbelievably pro-Likud Israel,” he said.

For more on Godson’s check out Tom Griffin’s excellent series for Spinwatch, The Godson Approach to Political Warfare.

Following is Guardian’s report on Policy Exchange’s fabrications:

A rightwing thinktank which claimed to have uncovered extremist literature on sale at dozens of British mosques was last night accused of basing a report on fabricated evidence.

The report by Policy Exchange alleged that books condoning violent jihad and encouraging hatred of Christians, Jews and gays were being sold in a quarter of the 100 mosques visited.

But BBC2’s Newsnight said examination of receipts provided by the researchers to verify their purchases showed some had been written by the same person – even though they purported to come from different mosques.

Several receipts also misspelled the names or addresses of the mosques where the books were supposedly sold.

The report, the Hijacking of British Islam, was based on the work of four teams of two researchers each who visited 100 mosques. They claimed to have found the controversial material in bookshops attached to 25 mosques, including one at Regent’s Park, London, and others in Manchester, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Oxford and High Wycombe.

Published on the eve of a state visit by Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, the report prompted front page news stories. Tory leader David Cameron pledged to raise the revelations with King Abdullah, because much of the literature was said to have been sourced from Saudi Arabia.

According to the report, one book, which said that there can be “no brotherhood” between Muslims and non-Muslims, was bought at the Leyton mosque in east London.

But the address on a receipt provided by the researchers was found to be that of an unrelated bookshop next door.

A spokesman for the mosque, Dr Usama Hasan, said: “It has nothing to do with us. It is totally inaccurate and misleading information. It is completely false. In fact, we are considering taking legal action over this because it has the potential to damage the good name of our mosque.”

Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “Policy Exchange produced a report that was given a lot of publicity, and Newsnight deserve credit for exposing the incredibly shoddy and dubious methodology that Policy Exchange have resorted to. It would seem that Policy Exchange had already decided what they wanted to say about mosques and just went out to find or should I say invent the evidence to justify their prejudices.”

Policy Exchange’s research director, Dean Godson, insisted it stood by the report “100%”. He said the thinktank had checked its evidence thoroughly and the allegations did not challenge the substance of the study – that such extremist literature was being widely sold.

“We are standing by our report and the Muslim researchers that helped compile it,” he added.

The researchers were unavailable for comment because they were all on a religious retreat in Mauritania, Policy Exchange told Newsnight.