Comments on: The Manchurian President

By: alexa

alexa — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:10:19 +0000

What Bill did is what Edward didn’t.
Both presidential candidates but one strived to find the good people at the same time who happened to be rich. Not all rich people are bad. And in U.S.A. a lot of rich people want to do good for their countries, of course, there are Manchurin global fund in the present time as well.

I hope the next time Edward understand what I wrote and try to find people like that, which is just like what Bill Clinton did. Hey, both were raised up to now from the similar grounds.

Government does not exist for certain profit organizations when everyone suffers except oil companies richer.

This election must address the issue why
all the people are getting lesser money
except oil industry people in U.S.A.

By: Dave On Fire

Dave On Fire — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:01:31 +0000

I reposted this on my blog, and someone pointed me to the original article in Figaro, and I have to admit, the way it is being portrayed by Nkrumah seems disingenuous and irresponsible.
The police aren’t investigating the accusations themselves, but tracking down the accusors. Far from “reveal[ing] that the French leader once worked for … Israeli intelligence”, the Figaro presents this as a probable smear campaign from the far right (whose “colours”, remember, Sarkozy has stolen).
I’m not saying that’s necessarily the case – Figaro quotes only official sources, and is known as a pretty right-wing paper generally, so maybe they’re playing down something bigger – but we certainly shouldn’t claim that they’re saying something they’re not.

By: Sarko and SOCPA « Complex System Of Pipes

Sarko and SOCPA « Complex System Of Pipes — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:43:10 +0000

[...] his employment record. Early last month, the influential French daily Le Figaro revealed that Sarko once worked for Israeli intelligence, as a sayan, meaning helper, meaning spy, and for all we know he still does. It matters little, [...]

By: Gene

Gene — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:56:49 +0000

In this particular instance, I strongly believe that the French electorate has been taken for a ride in the sense that the main opposition party, that of Segolene Royal, had been infiltrated by Ultra-Zionist elements, such as Kouchner*, long before the election. As well there were forces working in the background, it would seem. Taken together, the wiping out of the opposition was done in such a way that the French could not have been aware of what was happening. If what is said is true, namely regarding the role of eminence grise played by Jacques Attali in all of this, then the plan was very brilliant. ------- * Not to mention Royal herself who was "discovered" by none other than Jacques Attali. Indeed, Bourdieu himself was convinced that Royal was not a leftist.

By: Freeborn

Freeborn — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:20:54 +0000

Of all the candidates the French could have chosen in their recent election the worst by a long way was Sarkozy.

The French could have proved to the rest of Europe that they are indeed the intelligent and sophisticated electors they would like us to think they are.Instead they voted for a US/Israeli client ready to back US/Israeli imperialism.

It was ever thus.Mitterrand was an ultra when it came to retaining Algeria whatever the cost.Even more disgracefully he took a similar view over Rwanda.Backing the extremist Hutu regime that carried out the genocide.

Mitterrand supposedly came from the French left whereas as Sarkozy is an unabashed rightist.Heaven knows what obscene imperialist wars and NATO interventions he will back.

With Angela Murkel installed in Germany the Americans must be well made up.