<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rare Animals for the Israeli Occupation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fanonite.org/2007/07/10/rare-animals-for-the-israeli-occupation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fanonite.org/2007/07/10/rare-animals-for-the-israeli-occupation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie Brand</title>
		<link>http://fanonite.org/2007/07/10/rare-animals-for-the-israeli-occupation/#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arie Brand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanonite.org/2007/07/10/rare-animals-for-the-israeli-occupation/#comment-4186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It all seems to fit in a new Israeli public relations strategy, to focus attention on diverting little tidbits portraying the situation there in a lighthearted way.

Didn&#039;t they recently finance the flaunting of Israeli beach beauties in some &#039;Men&#039;s Magazine&#039; as well?

It is a strategy not without risks, I would say. If they keep portraying things there as if all is hunky dory, a fit environment for frolicking on the beach, the American tax payer might start to wonder why the place has to be shored up with American money to the tune of three billion dollars a year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all seems to fit in a new Israeli public relations strategy, to focus attention on diverting little tidbits portraying the situation there in a lighthearted way.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t they recently finance the flaunting of Israeli beach beauties in some &#8216;Men&#8217;s Magazine&#8217; as well?</p>
<p>It is a strategy not without risks, I would say. If they keep portraying things there as if all is hunky dory, a fit environment for frolicking on the beach, the American tax payer might start to wonder why the place has to be shored up with American money to the tune of three billion dollars a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeborn</title>
		<link>http://fanonite.org/2007/07/10/rare-animals-for-the-israeli-occupation/#comment-4173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freeborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanonite.org/2007/07/10/rare-animals-for-the-israeli-occupation/#comment-4173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only animals the BBC should be telling us about are the settler-fascists who,aided and abetted by the Israeli army,by stealing and settling Palestinian Arab land are in total breach of international law.

These are the animals who should be in Gaza Zoo.

Rather than subtle this is so much in-your-face propaganda that it shows just how low the BBC will sink in its now notoriously pro-Zionist coverage.

British people are laughingly derided for their love of animals precisely because people who are not British but who have a perceptive understanding of culture have not missed our abject indifference to, and culpability for,human suffering.

It therefore comes as no surprise that the BBC thinks the suffering of a few animals is a far more important issue than the suffering of Palestinians living under the brutal Israeli occupation.No wonder Auntie calls herself the &quot;British&quot;Broadcasting Corporation.

We might also read this drivel in order to glean just what a low opinion of its audience the BBC has as to think we need bashing over the head with this blatant Israeli propaganda.If the item had been covered on John Craven&#039;s Newsround when I got back from school as a boy my parents would probably have complained that the BBC was trying to indoctrinate credulous children with sick propaganda.

My parents would have been right too if they&#039;d refused to pay the licence fee forthwith.

The BBC has had an extremely bad three weeks.

Week 1:New Labour&#039;s fawning mouthpiece fell over itself to celebrate the new dawn of Brown&#039;s rule from No.10.This exceedingly dull and uninspiring man was of course beyond rescue even by the BBC.

Week 2:They droned on and on about the terror threat to stiffen up what they rightly sensed was a lull in the level of public hysteria.Muslims were rolled out to consecutively and to order denounce the  Islamists,who supposedly live among them.Some of these poor appointed spokespeople for their community had to sit opposite and pay heed to batty Zionists like Melanie(Londonistan)Philips.

How the BBC got it into its head that having such a rabid Zionist and one with such an inflammatory and ill-considered tabloid view of the world was neutral and restained coverage one cannot begin to fathom.    

Week 3:Began with master of deceit and spin,the absurdly arrogant and hectoring Alastair Campbell peddling his no doubt execrable memoirs on Blair&#039;s Iraq War chorus leader Andrew Martian&#039;s breakfast show.Campbell insisted he was not responsible for Dr Kelly having taken his own life,which was clearly the one true thing he managed to utter.Since Kelly was obviously bumped off the denial was irrelevant anyway.

That the BBC has made itself the abject and supine cypher for Israeli/US/New Labour propapaganda is no revelation of course but the sheer banality clumsiness of the last three weeks has plumbed hidden depths.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only animals the BBC should be telling us about are the settler-fascists who,aided and abetted by the Israeli army,by stealing and settling Palestinian Arab land are in total breach of international law.</p>
<p>These are the animals who should be in Gaza Zoo.</p>
<p>Rather than subtle this is so much in-your-face propaganda that it shows just how low the BBC will sink in its now notoriously pro-Zionist coverage.</p>
<p>British people are laughingly derided for their love of animals precisely because people who are not British but who have a perceptive understanding of culture have not missed our abject indifference to, and culpability for,human suffering.</p>
<p>It therefore comes as no surprise that the BBC thinks the suffering of a few animals is a far more important issue than the suffering of Palestinians living under the brutal Israeli occupation.No wonder Auntie calls herself the &#8220;British&#8221;Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>We might also read this drivel in order to glean just what a low opinion of its audience the BBC has as to think we need bashing over the head with this blatant Israeli propaganda.If the item had been covered on John Craven&#8217;s Newsround when I got back from school as a boy my parents would probably have complained that the BBC was trying to indoctrinate credulous children with sick propaganda.</p>
<p>My parents would have been right too if they&#8217;d refused to pay the licence fee forthwith.</p>
<p>The BBC has had an extremely bad three weeks.</p>
<p>Week 1:New Labour&#8217;s fawning mouthpiece fell over itself to celebrate the new dawn of Brown&#8217;s rule from No.10.This exceedingly dull and uninspiring man was of course beyond rescue even by the BBC.</p>
<p>Week 2:They droned on and on about the terror threat to stiffen up what they rightly sensed was a lull in the level of public hysteria.Muslims were rolled out to consecutively and to order denounce the  Islamists,who supposedly live among them.Some of these poor appointed spokespeople for their community had to sit opposite and pay heed to batty Zionists like Melanie(Londonistan)Philips.</p>
<p>How the BBC got it into its head that having such a rabid Zionist and one with such an inflammatory and ill-considered tabloid view of the world was neutral and restained coverage one cannot begin to fathom.    </p>
<p>Week 3:Began with master of deceit and spin,the absurdly arrogant and hectoring Alastair Campbell peddling his no doubt execrable memoirs on Blair&#8217;s Iraq War chorus leader Andrew Martian&#8217;s breakfast show.Campbell insisted he was not responsible for Dr Kelly having taken his own life,which was clearly the one true thing he managed to utter.Since Kelly was obviously bumped off the denial was irrelevant anyway.</p>
<p>That the BBC has made itself the abject and supine cypher for Israeli/US/New Labour propapaganda is no revelation of course but the sheer banality clumsiness of the last three weeks has plumbed hidden depths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

