Comments on: Iran’s Nuclear Option and the IAEA http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/ Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:14:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: L’ordre du jour pour l’Iran – Hystérie et hypocrisie « Futur Quantique http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-13411 Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:40:03 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-13411 [...] peut faire confiance à l’IAEA ? Scott Ritter était contrôleur des armes en Irak. Selon son blog, dans son livre de 2006, « Target Iran : The Truth About the US Plans for Regime Change » il [...]

]]> By: steph http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-9321 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:18:46 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-9321 I posted about the MKO today link they’re without doubt the most prolific terrorists in the Middle East, if we’re excluding States, and the NCRI is just a front for the MKO. The idea that they have the connections or capabilities to acquire Intel on Iran’s nuclear programme is ridiculous – they’re a despised cult, who recently are heavily into human trafficking and sexual exploitation, self-mutilation and self immolation. Not that that ever seems to bother the MSM when they give the claims that they uncovered this Intel credence.

]]> By: Kouchner Does Iran « The Fanonite http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-6421 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:34:59 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-6421 [...] but the lobby has for some time been annoyed with IAEA’s refusal to play ball (even though IAEA inspectors have been turning over data from their tours of Irani nuclear facilities to Israeli … ever since Iran began the voluntary cooperation. I emphasize the ‘voluntary’ because [...]

]]> By: Navigation, MeK and the Good Old Shoe « The Fanonite http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-2060 Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:35:30 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-2060 [...] off the State Department’s list of known terrorist organizations. According to Scott Ritter, MeK has been used since 2002 by the Israeli intelligence to publicize information on Iran’s nuclear program. Sobhani [an Iranian con-artist] and CDI [...]

]]> By: Chomsky’s Guide to Inaction « The Fanonite http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1504 Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:05:36 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1504 [...] This, to put it mildly, is what they call “bollocks” in Britain. Chomsky has been harping on this theme since before the Iraq war, and is now recycling it for Iran. What is absent in his analysis is the sole, and visible, constituency dragging the US government towards this war — the Israel lobby and its neocon vanguard [for more on this, check these excerpts from Scott Ritter’s new book]. [...]

]]> By: m.idrees http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1398 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:40:47 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1398 Well Ritter was famous for being extremely aggressive, and too close to the Israelis, during his stint as a UN Weapons inspector. He knows a lot about the Israeli connection, because he used to be a part of it, passing intelligence to Israelis in the early to mid 90s. As the years dragged on, however, he realized that the inspections were not meant to disarm Iraq. In fact, they were merely a cover for a policy of regime change. For that reason, the weapons inspectors efforts were all going to waste, since they could very easily certify Iraq as weapons free, however, they weren’t being allowed to go that far. That is when he resigned.

After the war, he made a documentary on Iraq and sanctions and latter became a vocal critic of US Iraq policy. The American right-wing, which initially loved him for his aggressive stance, turned against him at this point, and embarked on discrediting him. He was subjected to a really nasty smears and dirty tricks campaign.

Over all, I think he’s a very honest person with great integrity. He came to speak at an alternative summit we had organized to coincide with the G8 2005. As always, he was lucid and on the mark.

]]> By: homeyra http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1383 Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:07:32 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1383 Btw, what is all the controversy about Ritter?

]]> By: Blahblahblah http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1382 Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:26:32 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1382 On the subject of the group referred to in this article as the MEK (that’s actually the CIA and the Iranian regime’s preferred term for the PMOI, the People’s Mujahedin Organisation of Iran who are affiliated to the NCRI, National Council for the Resistance in Iran) I have no difficulty in believing that all sorts of groups get used (either knowingly or unknowingly) by those such as Mossad, it’s inevitable; the Middle East is crawling with all kinds of secret service nasties getting into bed with groups they have absolutely nothing in common with (and indeed are diametrically opposed to.) Of course I’m sure they certainly do use groups to acheive different aims to those intended, or even to acheive the same outcomes but for very different reasons.

I’ve always understood Iran’s desire for a nuclear
deterrent, although I’m no more comfortable with the idea of Ahmadinejad having a nuclear button at his disposal than Bush.

As for what you say about the MEK (the PMOI) it seems to me to be full of disparate people who gather under the same very broad ‘democracy’ flag but like any large organisation or movement is made up of individuals who often want and believe in very different things.

The Iranians I’ve met who support the PMOI and the NCRI range across a broad spectrum; the ones I most respect are totally against US global hegemony and would no more
countenance cooperation with the CIA or Mossad than cut their noses off.

]]> By: Grégoire http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1381 Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:28:54 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1381 how good, some news from Payman!!

]]> By: michael the tubthumper http://fanonite.org/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1380 Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:17:07 +0000 http://fanonite.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/the-nuclear-option-and-iaea/#comment-1380 the build up is all strikingly similar to the iraq thing.

the hypocrisy no longer comes as a surprise. in fact it is not a surprise any time after 11 years old

]]>